The Pakistan Cricket Board (PCB) has found itself in the middle of yet another controversy after the International Cricket Council (ICC) reportedly issued a firm reminder regarding official protocols. The recent Champions Trophy closing ceremony in Dubai has fueled tensions, with PCB officials feeling slighted over what they perceive as a snub. However, the International Cricket Council is unlikely to provide a formal clarification, leaving many questioning the underlying factors behind this dispute. This article explores the five harsh realities behind the PCB-ICC protocol row and its potential implications.
1. The Perceived Snub at the Champions Trophy Closing Ceremony
During the Champions Trophy closing ceremony, the absence of significant PCB representation sparked concerns. Pakistani cricket enthusiasts and officials expected due recognition for their role in the tournament, yet the ICC’s protocol decisions seemed to suggest otherwise. The lack of acknowledgment led to widespread discussions in the cricketing community, with many believing the PCB was unfairly sidelined.
LAHORE, PAKISTAN – FEBRUARY 22: A general view of the LED board ahead of the ICC Champions Trophy 2025 match between Australia and England at Gaddafi Stadium on February 22, 2025 in Lahore, Pakistan. (Photo by Sameer Ali/Getty Images)
This incident is not the first time a cricket board has felt undermined by global cricketing authorities. However, given the increasing influence of PCB in world cricket, the issue has gained considerable attention.
2. ICC’s Stance on Protocol and Ceremony Conduct
The International Cricket Council has made it clear that all ceremonies follow strict guidelines and established international standards. Their response to PCB’s concerns has been diplomatic but firm—advising all member boards, including Pakistan, to adhere to protocol regulations rather than expect preferential treatment.
Historically, the International Cricket Council has maintained an unbiased stance regarding event proceedings, ensuring that no team or board is singled out or given undue favor. This assertion suggests that PCB’s grievances might stem from misinterpretations of the standard procedures rather than deliberate exclusion.
3. The Geopolitical Undertones in Cricket Governance
One cannot ignore the political undercurrents affecting international cricket. Pakistan’s cricketing relations with key stakeholders, including India, play a role in shaping global cricketing dynamics. Although International Cricket Council operates as an independent body, some critics argue that politics inevitably influence decision-making processes.
DUBAI, UNITED ARAB EMIRATES – MARCH 09: Harshit Rana, Ravindra Jadeja and Arshdeep Singh of India celebrate victory after the ICC Champions Trophy Final match between India and New Zealand at Dubai International Stadium on March 09, 2025 in Dubai, United Arab Emirates. (Photo by Alex Davidson-ICC/ICC via Getty Images)
Tensions between India and Pakistan in cricketing affairs have often led to contentious moments on and off the field. Given that ICC’s headquarters are based in Dubai—a hub of diplomatic negotiations—the Champions Trophy closing ceremony may have been unintentionally entangled in larger geopolitical dynamics.
4. The Bigger Issue: PCB’s Standing in Global Cricket
PCB has consistently voiced concerns over its treatment in global cricketing affairs, from scheduling bilateral series to tournament selections and event hosting rights. While the board has made significant progress in strengthening its international presence, instances like the Champions Trophy ceremony row highlight the lingering perception that PCB still struggles for equal footing.
Comparatively, boards like the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB), the Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI), and Cricket Australia (CA) command more influence. The disparity in power dynamics could be a contributing factor to PCB’s frustration over perceived injustices.
5. The Road Ahead for PCB and ICC Relations
With the T20 World Cup and upcoming bilateral series on the horizon, PCB’s relationship with ICC remains critical. Rather than focusing on perceived slights, PCB might benefit from proactive engagement with ICC to ensure greater representation and influence in future events.
KARACHI, PAKISTAN – FEBRUARY 17: Rahmanullah Gurbaz of Afghanistan poses for a portrait with his ICC ODI Team of the Year 2024 Cap, with teammates Azmatullah Omarzai and his ICC Men’s ODI Cricketer of the Year 2024 Trophy and ICC ODI Team of the Year 2024 Cap and Rashid Khan poses for a portrait with his ICC T20I Team of the Year 2024 Cap during the ICC Champions Trophy 2025 Portrait Session on February 17, 2025 in Karachi, Pakistan. (Photo by Chris Hyde-ICC/ICC via Getty Images)
Strengthening Pakistan’s domestic cricket infrastructure, fostering better media relations, and advocating for transparency in ICC decision-making can help elevate PCB’s standing in international cricket. Additionally, leveraging its passionate fan base and financial contributions to global cricket can aid its pursuit of greater recognition.
The Champions Trophy closing ceremony controversy has once again highlighted the fragile nature of cricket governance and the role of power dynamics in global cricket. While PCB may not receive the formal clarification it seeks from ICC, the broader lesson remains: influence in world cricket is earned through strategic diplomacy and consistent performance both on and off the field.
For Pakistani cricket fans and officials, the path forward should focus on collaboration rather than confrontation. By aligning its strategies with best practices and fostering stronger alliances within the cricketing world, PCB can solidify its standing and ensure it commands the respect it rightfully deserves.